|
Meet
Devraj Shetty, look who crippled him
Fifth Column
Tavleen
Singh
DEVRAJ
Shetty is the most disadvantaged Indian I know.
He is poor, illiterate and severely handicapped from
a polio attack, at the age of seven, that also lost
him his home. His parents were too poor to support a
child with no legs and flippers for arms so they put
him out on the street and left him to fend for himself.
He spent years crawling around the streets of Bangalore
before someone helped him get to Madras where a charitable
institute donated him a wheelchair.
Then,
someone suggested he go to Mumbai because if he was
going to spend his life begging in the streets then
he was better off in a city whose streets were supposedly
paved with gold. So, he came to Mumbai and spent the
first few days terrified, hungry and lost at Bombay
Central station before a kind shopkeeper offered him
a place to sleep in the front of his shop.
The
shopkeeper now brings him every morning to Marine Drive
where he spends the day sitting in his wheelchair -
come rain or sun - and by 9 p.m., when the shopkeeper
comes to take him home, he has generally managed to
make enough to pay for his food.
It
was on Marine Drive that I met him late last year. We
got talking and when he told me his story I asked if
there was anything I could do to help. He said there
was. He hated begging and would like to live a life
of some dignity and believed he could do this if he
could be allotted a public telephone booth. There was
a scheme, he said, for handicapped people so it should
not be too difficult for me to get the allotment.
I
did not think it would be either and instantly, about
seven months ago, called MTNL and went to see the General
Manager. He was gracious and helpful and said he could
supply the telephone in a week but could not provide
a public place for it to be installed. He could only
give it to Devraj in his home if he had a home. But,
if I talked to the municipal commissioner I should be
able to get a public place allotted quite easily. Not
only did I contact the municipality but I also wrote
about Devraj Shetty in a column early this year.
By
fortuitous coincidence, Ajay Singh in Pramod Mahajan's
office read the piece and called me to offer help. I
suggested he speak to the municipal commissioner to
expedite things. This he duly did and permission was
granted but then it came to the turn of Mumbai's traffic
police to intervene. For months they dangled us along
with the promise that they were checking for a suitable
site but since it was taking so long I made a few private
inquiries and discovered that nobody was being given
telephone booths in the city. That the whole scheme
was a sham but a sham of convoluted proportions in which
small armies of officials pushed files around and pretended
to be looking for suitable sites.

All
the while Devraj kept hoping and hoping and hoping until
last week when I was finally told, after the umpteenth
search, that his request for a phone booth had been
rejected. An arrogant, senior police officer I spoke
to said, "We cannot be expected to allow booths to come
up if they are a danger to traffic". How a public telephone
booth on a payment can be a danger to traffic is beyond
me but such are the ways of the Indian state.
I
tell you the story of Devraj Shetty to draw attention
to the futility of the anti-poverty programmes on which
the Indian government spends more than Rs 35,000 crore
a year. These schemes have been criticised by the Planning
Commission, by prime ministers, by journalists and economists.
It has even been pointed out that if every Indian living
below the poverty line was simply sent a cheque of Rs
8,000 every year he would benefit more than he does
from the anti-poverty schemes but despite this why does
nothing change?
Why
does taxpayers' money continue to be poured into schemes
so ludicrous that a central government scheme to pay
old age pensions spends crores of rupees to provide
Rs 100 a month to old people in remote villages? Why
are goats and cows provided as part of some other foolish
scheme to villagers in areas where there is no grazing
land? For one reason and one reason alone: the money
goes into the pockets of the long chain of officials
who are supposed to be administering the scheme. It
also pays their salaries and provides them with houses
and cars and telephones. So, why should anything change?
My
failed efforts to help Devraj Shetty also taught me
something else. If with access to a hundred strings
to pull could not manage to get the machinery of the
state to move there is absolutely no chance that the
poor can benefit at all from the schemes that are supposedly
in place to lift them above the poverty line.
This
is why, despite our illusions of being an economic superpower,
India remains one of the most squalid countries in the
world. We would do much better to spend Rs 35,000 crore
a year on providing clean drinking water, sanitation
and housing in the slums of our cities than on meaningless
anti-poverty schemes that have served mainly to delude
the poor into believing there is hope when there is
non.
Telling
Devraj that he would not be getting his telephone booth
was one of the hardest things I have done. (Respond
to tavleensingh@expressindia.com)
Source:
Indian Express
Dated :21st July, 2002
|